Wednesday 3 December 2014

Shining a Light

I am not a political person by nature, so if I write a political essay it is because I feel strongly about the subject.
Let's talk about The New World Order and how they have slowly, but surely infested the United States Federal Government, and virtually all governments on a global scale.
The government of the U.S. and most others have been held hostage to the global banking institutions, and the large global corporations. This take over has not happened over night, but has systematically been put together over the last couple hundred years. In the U.S. this has manifested after the creation of The Federal Reserve Bank in 1913. The Federal Reserve is neither Federal, in that it is controlled by, or part of the Federal Government, nor is it really a bank. It's creation was though the banking system in Europe that was and still is controlled by the Rothchilds. It was implemented in the U.S, by Congress, and approved by then President Wilson who was against it, but signed it into existence under duress for his life.
With the creation of The Federal Reserve Bank the United Stated gave up the right to mint, and put into circulation it's own currency. Instead the Federal Reserve Bank mints the money and lends it to the U.S. which then pays interest on that money to the Federal Reserve. Sounds crazy, but it is true. You and I pay interest on every dollar printed by The Federal Reserve that is put into circulation.
As if this isn't bad enough, virtually all elected officials are, or have been financed by these globalist to acquire positions of power. It does not matter if they are Republican, or Democrats, they are owned and controlled by the same people. Sure, it looks like they are different; they fight and spat between each other to make people think they are different, but that is an illusion. Whenever it is a matter that is of interest to the global overlords, you will notice that they come together quite quickly. Take the Federal bail out of the banks two years ago; they quickly (too quickly) came to an agreement to give a trillion of OUR dollars to them, under the guise of a stimulus package to save our way of living.
First, we need to realize that this is the case; second we must realize that in order to solve this problem we need to elect people who are not indebted to the money/power brokers. It is time to refocus on The United States Constitution and to elect people who will truly support and defend it. I believe to be able to do this we need to create a viable third party that I will call the Constitutionalists. It has been shown that the global elite can control a two party system to their liking, but if we can institute a third party; one that is for the Constitution, and the American people, we might yet be able to take back our government, our money supply, and our freedom.
This article is from my blog "Mike's Common Sense". My blog is a common person's perspective on a variety of subjects; Spirituality, humor. life, and politics.


Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/4913946

Thursday 6 November 2014

Money, Gold and the Gold Standard

1. Introduction
Croesus, King of Lydians (Asia Minor), has been the symbol of wealth and power since ancient times. 650 BC he implemented his idea of making money from gold by having coins minted which then became official currency.
A new "era" had begun. The new small and handy exchange objects soon spread throughout the cultural area of the then Greek world and the adjoining regions.
Money represents the joint measure of all economic transactions. On the one hand, it is the (interim) means of exchange, which simplifies the exchange of goods (trade) amongst one another and, on the other hand, it embodies the function of the maintaining of value as well as a calculation unit.
Then, as today, money is a generally accepted means of payment prescribed by the state. The Latin word for money is "pecunia" and was derived from "pecus" = cattle.
When browsing through the history books of mankind, different objects (such as incense, wheat, metals, salt, stones, furs, shells, cigarettes, alcohol, paper money, etc.) were used as money medium, depending on the era.
Gold and silver were particularly significant here. This was and is not coincidence, because they are an ideal exchange and value maintenance medium due to their properties.
Wheat is only a luxury item in the event of a famine, but may rot and is thus not durable.
A diamond is durable and beautiful to look at, but arbitrarily divisible and similar.
Gold can be divided and melted arbitrarily and is in limited supply and has been known for centuries.
The history of money can be broken down into several steps, which may be by topic very different, but cannot be held apart in terms of time. In general, we distinguish the following steps: Natural exchange (goods for goods), natural money (a good, e.g. wheat or shells, was defined as money), metal money(full-value coins made from precious metals, expert term face-value coins, inferior to uncovered coins, expert term secondary coins),
cash (covered paper money and coins), as well as bank money is also called bank money (out money today, which is based on the creation of credit).
2. A glance into the past
In old Mesopotamia (3000 to 2000 BC) there was a money system that could be called the predecessor of the gold standard.
To be precise, the name "wheat standard" would be more befitting, because the underlying was not gold but wheat. It was defined that 1 shekel = approx. 170 grains. The word "she" roughly means wheat and "kel" was a measure similar to a bushel.
(The word "shekel" still exists in Hebrew as the name for the Israeli currency.)
Already back then, the attempt was made to define the exchange good (= money) by specifying money to the weight of the underlying (wheat) per unit. However, this money system was unsuccessful because wheat is entirely unsuitable as the underlying for a money system. (rotting, difficult storage, differing harvests, etc.)
In ancient times pieces of metal were finally applied as sign or emblem. Initially, every lump of gold had different measurements and weights, meaning that the value determination of every individual piece had to be re-established when trading; this meant that finally the idea was born to standardise the dimensions and weight of the metal pieces - the coin was born.
The thus minted coins made of gold (and silver) represent a gold currency, because they embody the value of the money in the form of firmly defined gold or silver proportion.
The fact that countries with a gold currency existed longest in history is remarkable.
The Eastern Roman Empire existed after introducing the solidus by Constantine the Great in 324 for more than 12 centuries, the Republic of Venice for half a millennium after starting to mint the ducat in 1284.
When introducing a gold coin currency, Julius Caesar saved Rome from a demise which would have occurred 400 years earlier. Rome only collapsed when the successors to Caesar continuously reduced the gold content of the coins.
Gold or silver coins of that time did not only have many benefits, but also drawbacks. Some drawbacks were the weight, storage and transport - in particular of large amounts over long distances.
Also the many centuries of attempts to dilute and minimise the precious metal content of the coins, had an adverse effect on money stability.
After several attempts, the gold deposit standard was implemented in Europe in the 17th century. It could be regarded as the predecessor of the gold standard, although it involved silver and not gold.
The historic gold standard, which is generally referred to in the publications and vernacular, started its global triumphal procession from England in the 19th century.
Here, an exchange rate set by the state was agreed. The value printed on the paper money was deposited in gold. The paper money was re-convertible at any time back into gold, while the exchange rate was the same.
A gold standard, i.e. a partial cover of the state money by gold, no longer exists globally. Some countries do have gold reserves (e.g.: USA 8,146 tonnes, Germany 2,960 tones, Switzerland 2,590 tonnes decreasing, France 2,546 tonnes, etc.), but they are in no way related or proportional to the relevant national currency.
If must, however, be noted that countries such as Mexico or Russia announced in 2001 to issue official currency money with silver or gold coins. On the internet numerous private providers, such as eGold or eDinar, offer a gold-covered currency on the basis of a clearing account.
2.1. The two forms of the gold standard
In the late Middle Ages, gold coins were the currency with the highest nominal value. Goldsmiths were regarded as particularly suitable to check whether the coins were pure and genuine. In addition, they had stable cassettes, in which they could protect the gold securely from thieves; this meant that private gold was deposited for safety reasons. Goldsmiths issued a receipt for the coins and charged a small safekeeping fee. If the owner wanted his gold back, he redeemed the receipt.
Over time, it was regarded as safer and, in particular, far more convenient to pay open invoices simply with such receipts. This means that the receipts of the goldsmiths became pledges to pay for the promise. And as soon as someone accepted the receipt as payment, he implicitly concluded a purchase agreement with the goldsmith, who thus fulfilled the function of a bank.
Summary: This type of gold standard is the gold deposit standard, where gold or silver was saved in a central clearing office (collection office), which corresponded to a gold coverage of 100%. In turn, the businessmen were issued with a voucher (=money substitutes) in paper form. With this credit, further transactions could be made in terms of accounting or exchanged for other goods and services.
The gold deposit standard, although based on silver, was used by private clearing banks, which played a major role in Venice, Genoa, Nuremberg, Amsterdam and Hamburg from the 17th century. In the 19th century there were more than 30 private so-called "note banks", which all issued vouchers. The Hamburg-based clearing bank (Hamburger Banco) had its own currency for more than 300 years, the so-called "Mark Banco", which was always linked to the specific silver price and thus fully stable.
However, Hamburger Banco nearly collapsed in 1857 when the businessmen had to withdraw silver and the bank was devoided of its precious metal. The crisis was avoided through major silver supplies from Austria-Hungary. A couple of years later, the private bank was closed by the state.
(It must be noted that this currency was simply a calculation currency which was never minted.
Mark was an old German weight measure, approx. half a pound).
A slightly different variant was the Banque Royale in France, founded in 1716 by John Law, which went down in history as the first state central bank. Law promised to cover bank notes with gold. The gold owners (mainly noble men) gave their gold to the bank and received shares in Banque Royale in return. Compared to interest-free gold, the shares promised a dividend. The gold served as the basis of trust for the issue of bank notes (livres). The notes were issued as credit to the state.
A couple of years later, John Law founded the Mississippi Compagnie, whose shares were sold for livres. Their business purposes was to promote the extraction of gold in Louisiana, which was a French colony at the time. In reality, the continuously increasing equity capital was diverted to the state treasury for consumption purposes. The more notes John Law's central bank brought into circulation through state loans, the higher the share price of John Law's Compagnie rose. As all bank notes were used for state consumption, they did not have any real value, except for the original gold amount.
In 1720 the first run on Banque Royale occurred. John Law was forced to undertake exchange control. He banned the private ownership of gold and jewellery in order to increase the gold stock of the bank. But the bank nevertheless went under.
The first central bank with strict rules for the gold cover of the bank notes in circulation was the Bank of England. Established already in 1694, it was forced to compete with private issue bank for the issuing of loans to the British state in the first 150 years of its existence.
Its main competitor was the South Sea Company, which in 1720 redirected the capital flowing out of the Mississippi Compagnie into its own shares. The money was partly invested into some opaque projects and partly in state consumption. The South Sea Company turned out to be as equally dubious as the company on the Mississippi, and its share prices and the trust in pound notes ended in a South Sea bubble.
The Bank of England survived the competition. The issuing of notes was subjected to a strict limit in 1844 as a result of the negative experiences, meaning that notes for a maximum of 14 million pounds were allowed to be uncovered. (Peel's Bank Act). This trust contingent was covered by state securities, but did not have gold as the underlying. Every additional pound could only be issued if purchasing gold.
This resulted in the classic gold standard as the first internationally valid currency system with paper money on a gold basis, with which issuing banks were allowed to issue more vouchers (money) than they held in stock in the form of gold (=partial gold cover).
A 100% cover with gold, as with the gold deposit standard, no longer existed, but a minimum cover was introduced. Gold hence only played the role of a regulative, because it was not possible to lend more than permitted by the cover threshold ("golden break"). We will come back to this later.
When fixing the parity, Sir Isaac Newton made a mistake in 1707 (the gold-silver exchange rate was wrongly calculated), with the result that gold and not silver became the standard.
At the start of 1800, Britain was regarded as the world's leading trade nation and thus the classic gold standard became the global system in the following years, after a short interruption.
Due to the war between Britain and France, which erupted in 1802, the Bank von England had to suspend the gold redemption of its bank notes. The gold prices subsequently rose strongly. (On the real reasons of this process, the banker David Ricardo informed the public in 1810/11 in his famous thesis On the High Price of Bullion.) After the end of the war in 1815, Britain reverted to the gold standard.
Other countries (France, Belgium, Italy and Switzerland) founded on 23.12.1865 in Paris a common coin association, which went down in history as the Latin Monetary Union. 3 years later (in 1868), Greece joined the association. Other countries, such as Austria, Finland, several small European states, some states in Central and South America, the colonies of contracting states, the German Empire (officially in 1873) and other states assumed the rules and regulations of the Latin Monetary Union.
The objective of the monetary union was to create a common money exchange as well as eliminate exchange rate fluctuations in order to establish in the long term a global currency covered with precious metal on the basis of the franc.
An outstanding figure in the 1870s was Britain's Prime Minister Disraeli (in office: 1868 and 1874-1880). It is more or less thanks to him and his connections to the Rothschild family that the international gold standard was established and London became the centre of the international currency system.
It must also be mentioned that the Rothschilds were the world's leading gold dealers.
Another important factor for the success of the gold standard were Britain's domestic policies. The link of monetary and employment policies was little known, the influence of trade unions and socialist parties insignificant. National bankers were able to implement their monetary policy in a strong currency and low inflation without any consideration.
The strict policy of a stable currency gave national banks a lot of trustworthiness. Therefore, they had the opportunity to influence the behaviour of the investors - which was particularly beneficial in times of crisis.
Every currency was - in line with the British model - simply a national name for a certain amount of gold, while the gold price (per troy ounce) was specified by the intervention policy of the Bank of England at its London gold market. It remained (unchanged) for nearly a century at 3 pounds 17 shillings and 9 pence.
(parity rate: 1 kg of gold = £ 136.57 = M 2,790 or £1 = M 20.43).
This resulted in fixed, unchangeable exchange rates of the currencies amongst one another.
This means that there was a global currency, gold, which was circulated as different paper money throughout the world, but interlinked through fixed exchange rates.
With a gold content of the pound of 9 grams of gold and of the thaler of 3 grams of gold, everybody knew that 3 thalers = 1 pound and 1 thaler = 1/3 pound remained such, because the monetary laws could be changed by parliaments but not by markets.
It must again be pointed out here that not money but gold is the measure.
Money is measured by gold and not the other way round. (Money was always devalued compared to gold, an increasing amount of money units had to be handed over per gram of gold.)
The gold standard was until 1914 a guarantor for international stability, stable prices and full employment for nearly a century.
The gold standard's stability was based on the strict compliance with national laws and cover provisions and the trust of the world of finance in the reliability of the system.
This is all the more remarkable as there were no international regulatory and monitoring authorities (IMF, World Bank, etc.).
(A couple of interesting calculation examples regarding gold then and today can be provided by Dr Timmermann.)
In addition, it should be mentioned here that employment rose and unemployment decreased during the era of the gold standard. Unfortunately, as the images prove, this fact is often presented differently.
Ian has seen the immense potential of the Internet and Facebook and is now an expert Article Marketer And Shares the Unique Detailed Tips To Increase Your Article Marketing Success Today and To Mentor You In Making Money Online With Gold! Go to meetianhannaford.com [http://meetianhannaford.com]
Gold price is only going one way and that is up! Grab your opportunity to get involved in the gold business, NOT coins they are not what they are cracked up to be, you want to be into Bullion ~ 24carat 999.9 fine gold!


Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/5224001

Friday 17 October 2014

Thinking About Investing in Gold?

This article may contain the most important information you will ever read! Unless you have been living under the proverbial rock you know that the price of gold and silver has been skyrocketing! The price of gold news dominates the financial segments daily! If you are considering making a purchase of gold and silver for your investment portfolio, you need to pay attention to what I am going to share with you in this article!
Why Buy Gold?
For those of you who are neophytes to the gold and silver market, you probably have many questions. You may be asking yourself, "Why buy gold?". That is a very good question. Depending on whom you ask you will probably get a different answer. I will tell you the reason why you should buy gold...Because GOLD IS MONEY!
When (notice I did not say "if") our currency fails (and it has to!) and our paper money is worthless, owning physical gold (and silver) will become the globally accepted currency. People will need gold to purchase the essentials of everyday life!
Another reason to buy gold is... Because Gold Is A Store Of Value! Gold never loses its value. The same amount of gold will buy an average home today as it did in the 1920s! The price of gold has an inverse relationship with the value of the dollar.
When the dollar is up the price of gold goes down. When the dollar falls the price of gold increases!
Quick Historical Fact: Throughout history, all the fiat currencies of great civilizations have failed! The U.S. dollar has had a nice run but it too is coming to a fast end! Learn from the past or you are doomed to repeat it!
Our nation is on the verge of a TRAUMATIC Economic disaster! The perfect economic storm is forming and it is just a matter of time before it hits. When that happens, hyperinflation will occur and the dollar will collapse.
Those who own gold and I mean "physical" gold, not stocks of gold companies, will become wealthy! At this writing, the price of gold is approximately $1,500 per ounce! I predict that within two years or less the price of gold will hit $5,000 per ounce or MORE!
In addition, here is the reason not to buy gold... Because Gold Is Not An Investing Vehicle! Yes if you bought gold and especially silver in the past few years, and held on to it, you have made quite a nice profit! However, trying to play roulette with the price of gold and silver is a fool's game.
Buy gold because... It Is A Hedge Against Inflation! As prices go up and the purchasing power of the dollar drops, your money is becoming worthless. So what if I am wrong and we do not experience hyperinflation and you went out and bought a boatload of gold and silver?
What is the worst thing that could happen to you? You would still own a boatload of gold and silver. Guess what? The value of gold and silver NEVER GOES TO ZERO!
The Problem With Gold As A Currency
When the dollar crashes and people start using gold for business transactions using gold bars, gold coins, and gold jewelry will not necessarily be practical. They are too big and will be worth too much money. You will not be able to buy groceries with a one-ounce gold coin worth $5,000!
The Answer: buy gold in small denominations of.5 grams, 1 gram, or 2-gram ingots! More on that later.
Where You Can Find Gold
It seems that gold is ubiquitous. It is everywhere you look these days, isn't it? These "Cash For Gold" places are apparently in every strip center in the country! Gold purchasing companies are advertising for you to mail in your gold and they will give you money back. Every other television commercial is promoting gold commemorative coins!
IMPORTANT TIP: Avoid these places like the plague! They are a supreme rip off. They are gold experts. You're not. They buy and sell gold every day. You do not. They do this for a living. You do not. They will beat you all day long.
I know times are tough and people need to pay bills so they resort to trading in their keepsake jewelry for easy cash. My advice: KEEP YOUR GOLD AND SILVER JEWELRY! It will be worth 100 times as much in a couple of years!
Beware The Pitfalls Of Buying Gold From These Sources
Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)
ETFs for gold and silver can be very good vehicles for trading but they can also be a major pitfall for investing. When you buy an ETF, you are buying shares in a trust that is owned and run by a bank, which might be holding gold or silver. However, shares in an EFT are not gold or silver, which is allocated to, and wholly owned by a single entity, YOU!
Numismatics
Numismatics is defined as the study or collecting of coins, medals, and paper money. They are considered "collectables" and as such are subject to being valued in terms of rarity and sentimentality. Numismatics coins are easy to buy, however, they can be very difficult to sell!
Online Sellers
Although there are many legitimate and reputable online services to buy and sell gold, there are just as many scams and fraudulent services out there as well! Only buy from a well-known online company. Do your homework and check with consumer watch dog agencies to confirm the online seller you buy from is trustworthy. Buy your gold from a service that comes recommended by someone you know and trust.
How To Buy Gold
Find a company that sells gold in small ingots or bullion. Ingots will be the perfect size for use as gold money currency. Make sure the gold in 99.9% pure kina-bar quality gold certified by an authorized agency. Be sure to shop around for the lowest storage fees. The best gold brokerage firms offer storage for free! Feel free to visit my website for a list of the best gold brokers in the market.
Storing Your Gold vs Possessing Your Gold
I recommend that you store most of your gold in a Swiss Bank or a Hong Kong bank.
This way in the event of an economic disaster the Federal Government cannot mandate you give your gold to them as they did during the Great Depression!
Should I Buy Gold or Silver?
For practical purposes, that is, using precious metals as a new global currency Gold is a better choice. It is not as soft as silver and small ingots bring a higher price. The price of Silver is forecasted to continue its meteoric rise with more room to go higher than gold. So if you are trading precious metals, silver is a better bet.
Best Book On Buying Gold and Silver
Easily, best book on the subject: "Guide To Investing in Gold & Silver" by Michael Maloney.
About This Article's Author
Tim Cronin is a Partner with KB Vision USA. For more info about the new global gold backed currency, visit his website. For more information about Buying Gold, please visit my website, and click on the page titled, "New Money System..."
Tim Cronin
Partner
KB Vision USA
For more info about Gold, The New Global Currency Please visit my website: [http://thevaluemarketingcoach.com]


Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/6334420

Thursday 14 August 2014

An International Conspiracy?

The Federal Reserve Act was passed Congress in 1913 and it established a privately owned central bank in the USA called The Federal Reserve. It had the power to issue currency and charge interest but it was only introduced after a very long campaign. 

One of the founders of the House of Rothchild, Mayer Anselm Rothschild said in 1790: 

“Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws...”

President Andrew Jackson knew that a privately owned central bank would work against the interests of ordinary people and for the benefit of a wealthy few so he refused to renew the charter of an earlier version of the central bank. He was the subject of a unsuccessful assassination attempt in 1836

President Abraham Lincoln printed his own currency (called Greenbacks) after the banks tried to charge him exorbitant rates of interest during the Civil War. He used the money to defend the Union by financing the war effort against the South.  

The Times newspaper based in London printed: 

“If that mischievous financial policy, which had its origin in the North American Republic, should become indurated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without a debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of the civilized governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all coun­tries will go to North America. That govern­ment must be destroyed, or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe.” 

Soon after, the British Government began to actively support the South

Were the British Government controlled by the bankers? Did the bankers control the media?Was there an international conspiracy?

President Lincoln eventually led the Union forces to victory against the South but he was assassinated in 1865. His currency was withdrawn and Congress passed the National Banking Act which provided for privately owned banks able to issue their currency and charge whatever interest they liked

It has been estimated that President Lincoln's policies have saved the USA about $4 billion in interest payments alone. They were only implemented for a brief period of time and this gives an indication of how much the USA owes as a nation and how much interest has actually been paid. 

If President Lincoln's policies had continued, would the predictions made in The Times newspaper have come true? Would the USA be a debt-free nation? Would it be the most prosperous nation in the world?

The Bankers understood at the time and understand now that the only real threat to their power is sovereign govern­ments printing interest free and debt free money. It would break their power.

The National Banking Act led to The Federal Reserve Act being passed. Congress gave up Its power to create its own money and gave it to the Bankers who called themselves the Federal Reserve. They now had what they wanted, the power to control the government by controlling the creation of the money.

President John F Kennedy started to undermine the Federal Reserve and began the process of printing his own currency for the benefit of ordinary people. He was assassinated in 1963.

Three Presidents trying to reduce the power of the banks. Three assassination attempts, two dead Presidents. Is this a coincidence?  


The USA is only one country. Throughout the world, the vast majority of sovereign nations have their money controlled by privately owned central banks. Do these bankers work together? Is there an international conspiracy?

It 2003, it was reported that only seven nations remained without a privately owned central bank. They were named as Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, North Korea, Sudan, Cuba and Libya. A USA led coalition invaded Iraq and Afghanistan soon after and also led military action against Libya in 2011. Who makes these decisions? Who will be next?

Wednesday 13 August 2014

Abraham Lincoln and the Greenbacks

Mayer Anselm Rothschild was one of the founders of the well known House of Rothchild. In 1790 he said: 

“Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws...”

In 1791, a central bank was established in the USA with a twenty year charter. It was called the First Bank of the USA but the charter was not renewed although a Second Bank of the USA was established in 1816. In 1832, President Andrew Jackson successfully ran his campaign for a second term using the slogan:

"Jackson and no bank"


In 1836, he was the subject of an unsuccessful assassination attempt but again the charter was not renewed.

The Civil War was fought between 1861 and1865 between the pro-slavery, Confederate South and the anti-slavery, Union North. President Abraham Lincoln led the union campaign and he attempted to raise money to finance the war from private banks based in the north. He was horrified and greatly distressed when bankers tried  to charge an interest rate of between 24% to 36%. President Lincoln was an honest man of great principle who loved his country and he refused to burden it with a massive debt which would be impossible to repay .

After much deliberation, he was advised to print his own currency to pay for the war effort and, with the backing of congress, he printed $400 million of treasury notes which had full legal tender. The notes were printed with green ink on the back and they became known as “Greenbacks”

President Lincoln soon recognized the great benefits of this course of action. He wrote:

“... (we) gave the people of this Republic the greatest blessing they have ever had – their own paper money to pay their own debts...”

The money was debt free and interest free and was used to finance the war effort by purchasing supplies, paying civil service employees and paying soldiers 

Soon after, The Times newspaper based in London printed: 

“If that mischievous financial policy, which had its origin in the North American Republic, should become indurated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without a debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of the civilized governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all coun­tries will go to North America. That govern­ment must be destroyed, or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe.”


The British Government began to actively support the Confederate South and tried to defeat the Union forces controlled by President Lincoln. They were stopped by two things. 

1.  President Lincoln knew that the British people would not support slavery so he issued the Emancipation Proclamation and declared that slavery was abolished in the USA. The British Government could not then openly support the Confederate South against the wishes of the British people.

2.  The Union forces were blockading southern ports to stop fresh supplies arriving from abroad. The Czar of Russia sent part of his Pacific fleet to the USA with orders to operate under the command of President Lincoln. They docked San Francisco and New York and acted as a deterrent to the Royal Navy and prevented them from breaking the blockade and helping the South.

The North won the war, the Union was preserved and the USA remained as one nation.

In 1865, President Lincoln said:

"I have two great enemies, the Southern Army in front of me, and the financial institutions in the rear. Of the two, the one in my rear is my greatest foe."

President Abraham Lincoln was assassinated soon after.

Congress repealed the Green­back Law and brought in the National Banking Act instead. The national banks became privately owned and able to issue interest bearing currency. The Greenbacks were removed from circulation as soon as it was possible.

In 1913, Congress passed the Federal Reserve Act which replaced the National Banking Act. It relinquished the power to create money (initially given by the Constitution of the USA) and handed it to a group of private bankers who called themselves the Federal Reserve. 

In 1963, President, John F. Kennedy signed Executive Order 1110 giving him the power to create his own currency. He was assassinated soon after

In 1972, the Treasury Department of the USA calculated that President Lincoln saved $4 billion dollars in interest payments by creating his own currency. Think about how much interest the government has actually paid


Monday 11 August 2014

JFK and Executive Order 11110

The 40th anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy (often known as JFK) was commemorated on 22nd November 2013 and a large number of people throughout the world believe that he was the victim of a conspiracy.

President Kennedy was always a maverick and very keen to confront controversial issues. He was fully aware of how the Federal Reserve used its power against the interests of ordinary people and for the benefit of a few rich individuals. President Kennedy knew all about the problems faced by Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War, how corrupt banking corporations worked against him and how he bwas forced to print his own money called Greenbacks.  

On June 4th, 1963, President Kennedy signed a document, called Exec­utive Order 11110 which gave him the power to create his own money. He intended to use it for the benefit of ordinary people and he proceeded to issue more $4000,000,000 of cash  which was both interest free and debt free. It seems obvious that President Kennedy was seeking to under­mine the Federal Reserve. Was he considering a full repeal of the Federal Reserve Act to allow Congress to create its own money?

A few months later, in November 1963 the world was shocked to hear the news of the President's assassination. As the days passed, there was frantic speculation about why anyone would commit such an appalling crime and it didn't take long for people with financial knowledge to put the two and two together. 

The day day after the assassination, all the JFK issued bank notes were withdrawn from circulation. Did newly installed president, Lyndon B. Johnson, order this? Who was President Johnson afraid of? Was he part of the conspiracy? Either way, the money issued by JFK was destroyed and ordinary American people were not informed. 

JFK  was the first President since Abraham Lincoln with the courage to stand up to the large banking corporations and they were both assassinated. Is this a coincidence?

The first ever assassination attempt on a US President was on President Andrew Jackson in ?1836. It was unsuccessful but he was another Presidential opponent of the large banking corporations. Is this a coincidence too? 

Why would anybody assassinate a President? Why must everything be covered up? 
What are they trying to hide?

superpaulia

shaggydoo

Sunday 3 August 2014

Rising Gold Prices - An Overview

It is important to grasp the big picture of why gold is going up and the factors that are fueling its rise.
An Overview Since 1974
In 1971 President Richard Nixon ended US dollar convertibility to gold, bringing to an end the central role of gold in world currency systems. Three years later Congress legalized the ownership of gold by US citizens. Freed from the government-mandated price of $35 per ounce, the dollar and gold floated. In 1979 and 1980, investors' lack of confidence in the government's ability to restrict the expansion of the money supply resulted in panic buying of precious metals as a hedge against inflation. Gold prices soared, and in January 1980 the gold price hit a record of $850 per ounce. During the four-year period from 1976 to 1980, the price of gold had risen by more than 750%.
In the early 1980s the US Federal Reserve raised interest rates to restrict money supply growth. This policy achieved its purpose and by 1982 interest rates were declining and the fear of inflation had subsided. Investment capital responded by moving into financial assets from commodities including gold, and the market soared. After the historic highs of January 1980, the price of gold meandered in the $300-$400 range until hitting a low of $256 in February 2001. Then the bull market for gold returned, and by November 2009 the price had pushed up to $1,140 - a rise of 445%. To some investors, this suggests that history is repeating itself and gold is heading beyond $2,000 per ounce. To return to the 1980 high, when adjusted for inflation, the price would need to be over $2,000 now.
Today's Gold Market
The price of gold is set by the Gold Fixing, which is also known as the Gold Fix or London Gold Fixing. Twice a day by telephone, at 10:30 GMT and 15:00 GMT, five members of the London Gold Pool meet to settle contracts between members of the London bullion market. These settlements brokered by the Gold Fixing are widely recognized as the benchmark used to price gold and gold products throughout the world.
Let's examine some of the factors that influence the price of gold.
Gold Supply
There is an agency that tracks of all the gold in the world. Gold Fields Mineral Services Ltd (GFMS) is an independent, London-based consultancy and research company, dedicated to the study of the international gold and silver markets. GFMS publishes the annual Gold Survey, which features comprehensive analysis and statistics on gold supply and demand for over sixty countries. GFMS estimates that above-ground gold stocks represent a total volume of approximately 160,000 tonnes, of which over 60% has been mined since 1950. GFMS estimates that all the gold ever mined would form a cube measuring 20 yards (19 meters) on each side.
The production of new gold does not generally keep pace with inflation. The aboveground gold stock increases at a fairly constant rate of around 1.7% per year. During the last 50 years the largest annual increase was 2.1% and the smallest increase was 1.4%. This is less than the long-term historic rate of inflation, which is 4%.
The single largest holder of gold in the world is the United States government, with 8,133.5 tonnes. As of November 2009 this gold supply was worth approximately $330 billion. Other top holders of gold include Germany, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Italy, France, SPDR Gold Shares, China, Switzerland, Japan, and the Netherlands.
The US Dollar
The price of gold is widely understood to inversely track the dollar. When the dollar falls the price of gold tends to rise. But there have been many cases when the price of gold did not keep up with changes in the value of the dollar, or even ran counter to it.
For example, when gold peaked in 1980, it reflected a prevalent fear of inflation in the wake of the 1979 oil shock and a U.S. monetary policy that lacked credibility. The case for gold as a hedge against inflation was persuasive. But today, the price of oil is up significantly in currencies other than the dollar. Even measured in euros, it has returned to the February save-haven peak. The weakness of the US dollar alone cannot explain the rise in price.
In early November, with the goal to support the United States' recovery from recession, the US Federal Reserve decided to maintain the massive stimulus measures and hold down US interest rates for "an extended period." With the Federal Reserve keeping rates low, a record US budget deficit continuing to rise, and central banks all over the world diversifying away from the dollar, gold may continue to be a very attractive choice. After all, the cost of borrowing money to invest in gold is next to nothing.
On the global markets there is a persistent lack of confidence in paper-based currencies. The weakening of the U.S. dollar has had a broad effect that reduces confidence in other currencies. And with central banks and government policymakers still entangled in their unprecedented fiscal and monetary interventions, this could continue for much longer.
The current strength of gold may be a reflection not of a specific response to the value of the US dollar, but rather the expression of the same underlying malaise with the lingering effects of the global financial crisis.
Supply and Demand
In recent years the decline in mine supply has been supplemented by several factors including sustained central bank gold sales. In the 1990s, central bankers were acting as a group to reduce their gold holdings, confident that the fiat currencies were a better store of value. Central bank reserve sales, which during the past decade have played a key role in keeping gold prices in check, have slowed recently. Now gold's attractions are re-emerging and bankers look set to be net buyers, which should help tighten the market.
In addition, scrap sales offset mining declines. In the first quarter, scrap sales rose sharply as gold re-visited its all-time high.
Industrial demand for gold is influenced by fabrication needs, which have dropped sharply since 1997. The global economic downturn, coupled with higher prices, further reduced the demand for jewelry, and supply-demand changes add little in terms of explaining bullion's rise.
Government Bonds
Ten-year U.S. treasury yields have rebounded from their end-of-2008 lows between 2% and 3.3%, but this does not necessarily represent widespread fear of inflation. There is little evidence that gold buying is the result of inflation concerns.
Speculation and ETFs
The 2008 surge in crude oil prices to US$147 per barrel suggests that a similar speculative bubble is forming in gold. However, one obvious difference between then and now is that when oil peaked, the forward market was anticipating a decline in prices. The gold market anticipates a rise, and forecasts a value of US$1,250 per ounce for June 2014. While ETFs were cited as a culprit for the rise in oil and are also playing a role in the gold market, their impact may be limited in the gold market.
Early in 2009 ETFs may have been active buyers, but their activity has leveled off since. There has been a sharp increase in long forward positions in gold at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and net longs have reached a record.
Despite all the attention being paid to sales of gold by central banks and the fact that world gold holdings have experienced a broad decline, holdings in industrialized economies are on the rise as a share of total foreign reserves. And this trend was renewed in the first quarter.
China and Foreign Markets
China is emerging as an international economic force and its reported gold holdings are not necessarily reliable. This is particularly significant now that Chinese authorities can make their purchases on the domestic market. The People's Bank of China (BOC) holds about 1,054 metric tons of gold, which is about two percent of its $2.3 trillion in foreign currency reserves.
Retailers and jewelers are increasingly reluctant to buy at higher levels. In recent years India has been the world's biggest importer of gold, and in February 2008 imports stood at 23 tonnes. The figure fell to 1.8 tonnes in January 2009 and in February there was no gold imported. But in October 2009 on the back of rising demand India's gold imports surged by over 45% at 48 tonnes. India had imported 33 tonnes in the corresponding period during the previous year.
In September 2009 the International Monetary Fund (IMF) announced that it would sell 403.3 metric tons of gold to strengthen its finances and increase its ability to make loans to developing countries. In November IMF revealed that from Oct. 19 to Oct. 30 it sold 200 metric tons of gold to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). The RBI paid $6.7 billion for the equivalent of about 8% of the world's annual mine production. As a percentage of foreign reserves, India's gold holdings are now higher than even China's. Many analysts believe India's purchase will spur other countries and investors to ramp up their gold purchases. Indeed, with 203.3 metric tons still on sale at the IMF, China may become the next big purchaser.
For more on the rising price of commodities and how to profit through gold stocks subscribe to the free WallStreetWindow stock trading newsletter.
The investment newsletter is free and contains plenty of stock tips and trading ideas for you to enjoy, including a weekly overview of the stock market.


Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/3558910

Monday 21 July 2014

The Evolution of Communism

I think most people are aware of the concept of communism as developed by Karl Marx. The idea was that workers revolutions would overthrow national governments, abolish capitalism and everybody would join together to live happily ever after in a  world wide workers paradise. Theory was turned into reality in both Russia and China (and later Cuba) with Lenin then Stalin and Mao Tse Tung (and Castro) in total control with assumed infalibility. Things didn't quite work out according to the plan and the road to utopia was, as always, covered with blood and without an end. The intended workers paradise turned into bloody dictatorships in both Russia and China and we've all read Animal Farm

Maybe we missed the point though. Maybe the abolition of capitalism and a workers paradise was a deliberate illusion and far less important than the overall control aspect

Russia abandoned communism as an idea in the early nineties but China carried on. They fully embraced capitalism and didn't pretend to play lip service to a failed ideology with any workers revolution nonsense. The Chinese communist party retained overall control, the Chinese economy boomed and they widened their sphere of influence by lending money. There was absolutely no prospect of meaningful elections and they showed little interest in the welfare of their citizens. Chinese leaders were still assumed to be infalible but everybody still remembered Tiananmen Square. I'm sure members of the Russian communist party wish they'd been less hasty

At about the same time, the leaders of European Union were behaving in a similar way. An unelected elite based in Brussels and Strasbourg assumed total control and persued capitalist policies with far less success than the Chinese. They massively increased their influence as more and more countries joined and were amalgamated into a homogeneous mass. A perceived terrorist threat, health and safety and human rights obsessions were used as excuses to erode long held freedoms. Some elections took place but the wishes and welfare of the electorate were totally ignored as the eurocommunists increasingly abolished national borders with a Europe wide Federation being the ultimate aim.

Meanwhile, the USA continue to expand the North American Free Trade Agreement throughout the American continent leading to an eventual American Union along the same lines as the European version.
The Russians, with President Putin in total control, embraced capitalism and looked to extend their influence too

Will these power blocks eventually cooperate to form a world government or will they compete to gain the upper hand? Is there a hidden agenda?

Thursday 17 July 2014

Future Uses of RFID Technology

Radio-frequency identification (RFID) technology uses radio waves to transfer data between devices and is often used for tracking.

The technology uses an electronic chip which often takes the form of a label or tag and is attached to a product. The chip contains identifying information which can be accessed using a reader and this has many uses:-
- to track clothing items in a supermarket and prevent theft 
- to track the progress of an automobile on an assembley line
- to locate pharmaceuticals in a warehouse
- to identify pets or livestock (the chip is implanted under the skin)

RFID technology has many other applications including access control. The chips containing identifying data are contained within identification badges which authenticate the holder on entry. A similar system can be used for vehicles

It is used on the London Public Transport system where the chip is inserted into a card which identifies the user at each location and calculates the appropriate fare. The same cards can be preloaded with credit and used to make electronic payments. The need for cash has been eliminated and the cards will soon be compulsory 

A similar recent development has enabled adapted mobile phone to be linked to bank accounts and used in to make electronic payments. 


The first E-passports using RFID technology were issued by Malaysia in 1998 and other countries soon followed including most EU countries around 2006. An E-passport contains a chip storing a digital photograph, personal information and travel history 

Animal identification is an important uses of RFID technology and most pets have a chip implanted for easy identication . Implantable RFID chips are now starting to be used on humans e.g. VIP customers at certain nightclubs can be identified and the chips used to pay for drinks. Some hospitals in the USA have begun implanting patients with RFID chips for routine tracking and to increase efficiency

Possibly this trend will increase in the future. Implanted RFID chips on humans could be used for identification purposes and to improve heathcare efficiency nationwide. It could also be used to make electronic payments and reduce the need for cash

Maybe it will begin on a voluntary basis for those with private heath insurance and participation will be linked to benefits such as lower premiums and preferential access to services. It may lead to other benefits such as those with implanted chips getting quicker security screenings at airports. 

Where will it end? Consider some possible scenarios with no timescale included although some of these events have started to happen 

In the future, a possible major emergency caused by a terrorist attack might lead to the introduction of martial law with local chipping stations immediately deployed. They would be available as a precasution to ensure that you and your family could receive emergency rations and other vital services if required. Stockpiled RFID chips would be available for immediate use

Prisoners would be chipped first. There is no better way of tracking criminals or people on parole? Maybe, everybody receiving benefits or government healthcare would need to be chipped to prevent fraud. 

A massive propaganda campaign on TV and in the media would be needed to convince the population that any fears they have about privacy or intrusion are unfounded. 

Full implementation would soon be on the cards and could be linked to safeguarding and the protection of children because this is always an easy target. Any parent who refused to chip their child could not send them to school and would thus be an irresponsible parent. An appointment with the child protection services would be made

Chip scanning devices could be installed in major public venues. Anybody who had not been chipped would not be granted access on health and safety grounds. They would not be able to use public transport because it would be too dangerous for themselves and everybody else. All responsible citizens would need to have a chip implanted for their own safety due to the hightened terrorist threat  

In reality, an implanted RFID chip could be used to track every move you make both physical and economic. It has massive potential for mischief making in a George Orwell inspired world. Without one you would be unable to function in society. Potentially, you would be unable to travel, to work, make payments, receive healthcare or any other goverment service. You would be unable to function in society and any dissident could be excluded from the economy because cash will no longer exist. Globalisation has forced governments to act collectively and made borders irrelevant. There will be no hiding place 

This was predicted in the Book of Revelations written in 96 AD

"And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond to receive a mark in their right hand or in their forehead. And that no man might buy or sell, save that he had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of the beast"

The prophesy predicts that people will be forced to receive a mark on their right hand or forehead. Is this an implanted RFID chip? 

Paul M Williams

Wednesday 16 July 2014

A Cashless Society and the Mark of the Beast

It was recently announced that cash will no longer be accepted on the London Bus system and the use of plastic cards, which can be preloaded with credit, will be insisted upon. This follows on from a similar announcement in Kenya where public transport will also go cashless and switch to an electronic payment system.  
The move towards cashless transactions is very much an increasing trend and governments throughout the world are pushing the idea of a “cashless society” i.e. a world where all payments are made electronically. Obviously, proper records will have to be kept and these will have to be readily available to all those concerned. Important and powerful, global organizations including the UN are involved but developments along these lines could have massive implications for individual freedom and privacy.
Supporters point to an obvious reduction in overheads by removing the need to produce/secure physical cash along with possible reduction in tax evasion, armed robbery and black market fraud. Critics are wary of governments operating in a George Orwell inspired world and being able to monitor every item of economic activity.  The NSA snooping story adds weight to these claims  
The debate continues but  some governments e.g. UK and Kenya are already working hard to reduce  the reliance on cash. The end objective, which may be years down the line, can only be an eventual end to all cash transactions and a world economy based digital commerce.

It has been portrayed as a natural progression and an example was a CNN feature on 2/7/14 called “The Evolution of a Cashless Society,”  which described the progress made by various countries. The eventual introduction of a cashless society was presented as inevitable and apparently the United States is at a “tipping point” while Canada, Belgium, France, Sweden, and others are “almost cashless.” Other countries are either at the “inception” or “transitioning.” 
In reality, the “trends” are not happening naturally and big business is playing a major role. Governments are driving the cashless society developments with taxpayers money and well funded foundations are joining in to build support. For example, in September 2012 the Ford Foundation, launched the "Better Than Cash Alliance" which describes  itself as a partnership "to empower people by shifting from cash to electronic payments." The partners include big business representatives like Visa and Citibank as well as the UN 

Maybe the move towards a cashless society is a natural progresssion or part of evolution but the arguments against are not being heard. If the trend continues, it seems that all transactions will eventually take place electronically and the need for cash will be eliminated but will the technology always work? Will we need a card for the bus, a card for the train and one for each store or will a universal payment system be developed? What if the card is mislaid?

Various systems are in development and a system using a mobile phone to make payments has been used successfully. Again a mobile phone can be mislaid and what happens then?
Mobile phones are routinely used as tracking devices and an increase in their use can only make it more widespread

Some organisations have advocated the use of a human micro-chip with the eventual goal of each person having a device inserted under the skin and able to use it to provide identification and to make electronic payments. 

Maybe this is the path we'll follow but there is massive potential for making mischief. Do we really want to give the government the ability to track every move we make? In a cashless society, a political opponent could be removed from the economy and wouldn't be able to buy food. A power cut would cause absolute chaos

It might be a the fulfilment of prophesy because Revelations 13:17 reads 

“And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name,”